Friday, 14 August 2015

Sharing our Passions with students - Engaging or Indulgent?

The problem with Ben and Jerry


Some time ago, a fellow educator, let’s call him Ben, was discussing another colleague, Jerry. Now, Jerry is an excellent teacher on all fronts. He does his job effectively while regularly volunteering to coach several teams & coordinate multiple events at the school. He is, in all ways, a committed and involved member of the school community. He also has a preoccupation with the Montreal Canadiens.  


I would like to suggest that it is an unhealthy preoccupation, but I suspect that would be a product of my forty-plus year allegiance to the Buffalo Sabres. This is a passion for him and he regularly incorporates it into his lessons. 





This does not apply to the reading or viewing of the Roch Carrier short story "The Sweater". I affect my best Quebecois accent every year to share that engaging and chat-worthy piece of Canadiana.






Jerry goes a little further - (or a lot further, according to Ben). He will incorporate the Montreal squad into math problems or as examples of statistical analysis daily. He will use stories from the current team or team history as his teaching or writing prompts. Canadian history in his social studies lessons are inexorably tied to Les Habitants and his walls are covered with logos, team pictures and other assorted paraphernalia. Some would even argue that his mood is dictated by the team’s success.  

Over lunch, Ben lamented to me,  “I really feel for those kids. That wouldn’t have interested me in the slightest. I would have been bored and miserable being bombarded by that everyday.  It would make me detest the sport of hockey, not love it.  I’ve certainly developed a knee-jerk repulsion to that logo.”


Granted, Ben is not a sports guy. He is, however, also an excellent, giving educator who helps kids succeed in other areas - particularly in, music, art and literature. He has his own passions and, on occasion, shares them with students. However, he is far more reserved and only introduces them when they fit specifically with an area of curriculum he and his young charges are exploring. Consequently, there is no evidence of his appreciation of Van Gogh or Brahms in his classroom and the student have never been asked to write an essay on Miles Davis or Monet.


But, there’s something to be said about a teacher that brings his own life experiences and interests into the classroom.  It makes the teacher real and genuine. I loved my Grade 6 teacher, Mr. MacDonald, when he would tell us about hiking the Bruce Trail or camping in Algonquin Park. My Grade 9 math teacher, Mr. Lee, was also a martial arts instructor and practitioner who would tell us about his tournaments - the wins and the losses. We are supposed to be passionate and sharing our lives and interests is essential - correct?


When is it enough and when is it too much?



Ben’s criticism immediately made me look inward and consider my own practice. Do I incorporate too many of my passions into my curriculum? Have I been alienating former students? Were those expansive cross-curricular units hinged by a television series too much? Did they really connect to the curriculum? Were they really worth the time?  


I took the time to consider this and thought I needed a list. These precepts have always guided me - I’ve just never organized them formally. I guess this will become my litmus test for incorporating passions.


1./ Is there a clear curriculum connection or are you forcing it?


I’ve found that it is better to look at the curriculum and then consider what it connects to it rather than the other way around. Granted, many educators know their curriculum well and are immediately enthused when they see something that fits. In 2013, a colleague who teaches grade 6 saw the film “Gravity” and quickly made field trip plans for his class before it left the theaters.


2./ Is it self-indulgent or lazy?


Are you doing the unit because it pleases you or because you think the students will truly benefit from it?  Worse still, are you “treading trodden trails” because it’s easy and you’ve always done that unit. Clearly, Jerry is being self-indulgent. Also, despite great enthusiasm, there are units that simply go stale. I've there always more passion in the fresh and new - I know it, and my kids can certainly feel it.


3./ Does it, in any way, alienate a group of students (seen or unseen) in your classroom?


Is a sports-themed unit unsettling for the student who has no interest in sports? Does a scene from a lavish musical-theatre production make a student from a machismo home feel uncomfortable. I think it is imperative that students should get exposure to a wide range of experiences - so focus on that. Make the experiences broad and avoid dwelling in one area for too long.  


4./ Is it appropriate to share?


Your own sensibilities have to be put aside and you need to think about it against the backdrop of your school community. Sometimes, you can push the limits. Sometimes, you need to accept that the sensitivities of your community do not match your own and you have to let it go. This is a tough one. I still struggle with this when I feel that something of extraordinary value is being silenced by unnecessary or misguided conservatism.


5./ Are your mis-remembering it and applying your own experience to it?


Sometimes, great movies or television series from our past carry with them stereotypes and sensibilities that would make us cringe today. I grew up loving the Tintin graphic novels. However, the original releases are alarmingly racist - despite the fact that the protagonist is noble, kind and honourable.  Sometimes, they are just tired and worn out. Be sure you revisit before you share.


6. Is this often harmless fun (and am I overthinking this a bit)?


I have a Sabres logo and a few small bits of sports paraphernalia (all given to me by students) placed near my desk. I I often use stories from the world of sports to highlight aspects of perseverance, commitment, teamwork and sportsmanship. That’s harmless stuff. Relax.

Next time, on the 50/20 blog 


I will apply these rules to the lessons I am planning for the upcoming year.  Will they pass the litmus test I have set out for myself?


Disclaimer

Ben and Jerry are fictional amalgams of several colleagues and many conversations. If you've worked with me - and are a Montreal Canadiens fan - it isn't you.

Monday, 10 August 2015

The Homework Conundrum

My Perfect Homework System (or so I thought)

I have been a homework proponent for many years, 15 years, at least. I believed that, over this time, I had crafted the perfect method of homework delivery.  My system was easy to follow, it respected the time, abilities & needs of each student and it took family situation into consideration. Concurrently, it did not overwhelm me or unnecessarily waste classroom or professional time.  

As the years have passed, my system has seen modifications and improvements. This past year, it was almost nearly paper-free. Additionally, I have incorporated and refined a “point-based” reward program that respects differentiated instruction, allows for some classroom gamification and lends itself to an “easy to keep” daily recording system - which, informs my marks for the Learning Skills section of each Report Card.




(In Ontario, we report on six Learning Skills  - homework completion can help assess Responsibility, Self Regulation, Independent Work and Organization.)  







I liked my system.  Beyond believing it to be fair, equitable, respectful and manageable - I also felt that it was purposeful. It was connected to both curriculum learning and also to building the habits necessary to succeed beyond elementary school.  Like a proud father, I confidently and eagerly shared my success with all who would listen - particularly Student Teachers (admittedly, a captive audience.)  I gladly absorbed the occasional, friendly jabs from staff-room colleagues whose barbs have involved the words statistics, analytics or even sabermetrics.  Undaunted, I plodded on. Besides, that stuff works - just watch “Moneyball”.


Open to change

Courtesy Teacher Tech Blog 


As I have expanded my PPD (Personal Professional Development), I have made some fantastic connections with other educators through both Twitter and Edmodo.  I was alarmed to discover posts and tweets (some with aggressive attention-grabbing pictures) that cautioned teachers about the perils of homework.






Most disquieting for me was the realization that the authors of these startling mandates were educators that I had grown to respect.  I had learned so much from them in such a short time and I regularly co-opted and implemented the wonderful resources they shared.  I had read a number of their blogs and felt as if I had found kindred spirits on my journey through the wayward pines of pedagogy. Was I wrong?



"Glass Half-Full" - My Open Mindset Mantra

I quickly realized that I was reacting to bold Tweets and startling images.  I had not sincerely or systematically evaluated the essential arguments of their blog posts.  So, I  began a journey down that rabbit hole - encountering the following articles on the way....





I even reviewed the other side of the coin (or my side of the coin, I suppose) by reading this post from

John Walkup’s Cognitive Rigor to the Core blog

A Strong Case for the Prosecution

In order to evaluate the concerns of the homework detractors, I have distilled them into the following list.  It becomes clear, quickly, that sound concerns are being raised.
  • Homework doesn’t connect with the real world.
  • Homework cuts into family time.
  • Homework that is not understood leads to frustration or requires parent involvement.
  • Homework widens the inequality gap and adds frustrations to those on less equal shores.
  • Adults don’t do homework every night, why should kids?
  • The teacher should be present to support independent work
  • Reviewing it the next day eats up valuable time
  • (Some research suggests that) rote practice does not pay satisfactory dividends to justify it.
  • There are much better things students can do at night (See links from Jason Wigmore below)
  • Homework is not fun.


In my own Defence

I reflected on this and revisited my rationale for homework.  In the process, I realized that my methods are not without flaws and I know that I need to continue to modify my approach. However, I have decided that I will continue to assign homework while adhering to the following considerations.


1./ Homework should be relevant.
It should reflect the concepts we are learning in a practical way.  Consequently, it should rarely be a worksheet. It should be an investigation that has a real world implications.  For example: After learning the area of a rectangle, students could be asked to find the area of three common items in their household (cloth tape measures provided on request). They could then be asked to use Edmodo to provide their results and respond to a critical thinking question about their discoveries.  “Why do you think the area of your television is important to your parents? Is it important to you? Why or Why not?”  **This year, I hope a shared Google Sheet will allow us to analyze the varied results.
2./ Homework should not be daunting.  
It should be modified when necessary and should be able to be completed within a short time.  (I use the familiar “5 minutes multiplied by the grade” formula). If a student does not understand the work, I encourage parents to direct them to another activity for an equivalent amount of time and to send me a quick note - through Edmodo, ClassDojo, email or on paper. I am now better informed and can prepare support (often the same evening, but certainly the next day).


Additionally, I assign homework every day on weekdays only (Monday to Thursday).  I want the weekend off - the kids should have it too. This allows parents to learn and know the routine. "I don't have any homework." is never a true statement on weekday nights.


3./ Homework should never be used to determine a grade for a subject.
As I have mentioned, homework completion informs my assessment of Learning Skills but I never use it to determine a grade in a subject area.  Students and parents should see it as a practical opportunity to expand their knowledge, independently explore and communicate a fledgling ability or strengthen the application of a skill.  


4./ Families are busy. Students are busy.  I’m busy. Our class is busy.
Homework completion requires flexibility and consequence should be reserved and then, if necessary, measured. Regular homework completion is expected but there are far more important factors at play. Ownership for the homework is paramount.  This means that the student must take responsibility for it and organize his or her time accordingly. Infrequent lapses and oversights are to be expected and do not warrant a conversation or even the furrowed brow of marginal disapproval. The points for the day are not awarded and we simply move on.


If homework completion is not being completed regularly, it indicates a larger problem and a reason for a discussion first with the student (again an opportunity for ownership) and then with a parent and the student.


5./ Homework should (eventually) come with options
To start the year, homework is fairly simple and sometimes involves worksheets.  It is my goal to establish the routine so that the reward system and its connection to Learning Skills can be understood.  Eventually, the student is provided more options and is able to demonstrate additional independence and ownership over the subject matter and the time that is required to complete it. Students who complain that the homework is too easy and too mundane are encouraged to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the concepts we explore.  Week long, self-directed pursuit of their passion can be explored through my “Books in a Backpack” option or by providing evidence of their own personal quest for knowledge or mastery of a subject or discipline - the Genius Hour expanded.

Alternately, students who are struggling can be helped to choose an area of weakness and focus on it.  An intensive reading program matching their ability (through Raz Kids perhaps) might serve them far better than struggling through reading assignments culled from Tween Tribune or Newsela.  An independent program can be easily tailored on Prodigy Math to support basic skills in order to build each student’s capacity.


Certainly, this approach requires more involvement from the teacher - but, it is has been my experience that a few bumpy weeks in October will pay dividends throughout the rest of the year.

A sincere "Thank You"to those Homework Detractors

I haven’t changed my mind - but I have moved forward.  I have started toying with an idea that will give my students even more flexibility. Jason Wigmore's suggestions to encourage more self-directed learning, using Epic! Books , Minecraft , Wonderopolis or The Hundred Word Challenge did not go unnoticed. I will likely keep my established Mathematics Mondays and Xtramath expectations in place, as well as Tween Tribune Tuesdays - which launch our Shared Reading discussions the next day.  

However, I will find a way to introduce Talented Thursdays (where students will focus on enhancing existing skills of their choosing).  This could easily include multiple intelligence options.  Perhaps a capable, ten-year old soccer player decides to go for a 25 minute run and reports her time and distance to me on Edmodo...or a future chef makes dinner for the family and he sends a photo to me as evidence. Weakness Wednesdays might be a wonderful counterpoint to this - with focus aimed at improving an area in which they struggle.

Thank you, Alice, Jason, John & Mark for encouraging me to think forward - and not settle for my current understanding of "The Perfect Homework" System. It continues to be a work in progress.

Wednesday, 5 August 2015

From Safe Harbour to Slippery Slope - The "New" Ontario Health Curriculum

Here comes the Boom


Last spring, the Ontario Government released the details of the updated Health and Physical Education Curriculum. However, it was quickly branded the “New Sex Ed” curriculum by both detractors and defenders. Controversy and commentary began immediately, and I was soon hearing and reading everything from legitimate, well-considered critique to absurd criticism and outlandish generalities.  


Within the month I was fielding questions from parents, friends and intrigued strangers at social gatherings. It was a political hot-potato and teachers were often thrust into the spotlight as instant authorities. The big questions (other than the occasional “Is it true that…?” inquiries) seemed to be “Did I agree with it?” and “How was I going to implement it?”


My Temporary Harbour of Ignorance



At that time, I was safe.  I was far too busy with the current school year and the existing health curriculum - so I didn’t have to comment.  My grade 4 students were dealing with the dangers of smoking - creating skits about “saying no” and manufacturing warning labels with Google Draw - safe from the storm of controversy in our little harbour of ignorance.


I did, however, remind any inquisitor that the classroom teacher remained an important human factor standing between the specific expectations of the curriculum and the delivery of that information to the student. He or she is the filter who will make a sincere, prudent and professional effort to meet the expectations of as many people as possible.  It was a good sentence and it afforded me many thoughtful nods of approval.  At the least, it was long enough for me have time to change the topic - “So, how about those Jays?”


How do I square that circle?


It is now mid-summer and I do have the time to examine the documents for myself.  I should preface that I am only looking at the Grade 5 (C1.3 C1.4 & C2.4 pages 156-158) and Grade 6  sections (C2.5 C2.6 &C 3.3, pages 174-177) of the curriculum.  I am setting up my lessons for the upcoming year and I know that the flames of controversy will be fanned again on the next "slow-news" day. I know that, this time, I will need to be prepared.



After reading it for the first time...I remarked that it didn't seem markedly different from the curriculum I remembered when I last taught Grade 5 & 6.  Looking back at the 1998 document - I was correct.  


Regardless, I typed the following in my lesson plan notes to use as my anchor moving forward...


“So, how do I professionally approach this curriculum in a way that respects the importance of these concepts? How do I ensure that students are prepared for the changes they will undergo while also respecting their innocence? Concurrently, how do I respect the multiple values of each family and culture in my school community?”




I keep thinking about an image I saw on the CBC website several months ago.  A group of chilly protesters are gathered in front of Queen’s Park with a flag that read “Math not masturbation, Science not sex!”




I know I echo the sentiment of many educators when I say - We agree - we don't relish the idea of teaching the "prickly-topics". We would far prefer that the family navigate the edges, angles and corners of human growth and sexuality. In fact, we would rather focus on many of the more conventional topics and leave much of the health curriculum to parents - including dental hygiene, healthy eating & internet safety.  It would certainly free up a lot more time for things like coding, writing, and problem solving.  

However, the prickly topics are unavoidable because we should all be in the business of making informed thinkers. We all want to be difference makers and provide our young charges with the important information they need to protect them from as many avoidable pitfalls as possible.  The question seems to remain - Who needs the information and when do they need it? Additionally, if my students are not able to make healthy choices with their bodies, diet, dental hygiene or internet interactions - things like coding, writing and problem solving become a minor concern.


At this time, I need to take a necessary pause and turn my attention to something else - perhaps the recently adapted Social Studies curriculum.  A fall election is looming and I need to be prepared to maximize that learning experience.  Hopefully, someone much smarter than I will provide me with the ideal approach to this slippery slope.  Volunteers?

Why the 50/20 Blog?

In my first post "The Tyranny of Choice" I talked about my struggle to find the perfect title, or URL, for my education blog.  I have tinkered with many - only to create a long and unnecessary delay in my efforts.


I guess I spent much of my thought on my audience.   After all, it is an important lesson I teach to my students when they write. Should I be writing a blog that has a title that will attract other educators? colleagues? parents? students?   How can I welcome anyone on this personal and professional journey?


How clever should my title be?  I once named a Fantasy Baseball team the "Hurley Buehrles" - my punny-play on the last name of a Toronto Blue Jays’ pitcher. I was chuffed by my wittiness until it became increasingly clear that the team I had selected did not deserve a clever moniker. I realized again, it's not the name, it’s the content that matters.


This summer, as I embarked, again, on my quest to create an active blog, my struggles began anew. However, this time, the mental gymnastics were short and an ideal name revealed itself to me quite quickly.  I'd love to say that, like Chris Cornell's "Audioslave", it came to me in a “shaman-like vision”, but that would be embellishing the mundane.  I thought of it while walking to school one morning.


This summer, I turned 50 and 2005 also marks my 20th year as an educator. (I am counting my year of Teacher’s College).  The 50/20 Blog was born. To use a golf analogy, I am (without a doubt) on the “back 9” of this beautiful and challenging course - and I want to finish strong.  This blog can serve to mark this occasion and also act as a scorecard for my journey.  


Like most veteran educators, I would not dare suggest I scored below par on the first nine.  I think I shot well... I certainly learned from my mistakes and managed to pull myself out of a number of hazards.  By its very nature, this is a profession that propels us forward and makes us adapt and change to the landscape.  You can’t reflect on mistakes and missteps.  You can’t fret over missed opportunities and there are no mulligans. You simply must move forward. As Stephen Stills once wrote…


“Don’t let the past remind you of what you are not now.”




So, I move forward to the next tee, eager to begin another year.  I am now overwhelmed with the task of finding the best way to get everything in motion with my new class - Edmodo, The Global Read Aloud, Dot Day, Tween Tribune, Class Dojo, Thrively, Edmettle, Kidblogs, NoRedInk, Hank Zipzer, and more.  There is a Federal election in October and that is a teaching opportunity that can't be missed. There will be successes and casualties on the way.  I have changed grades and I am embarking on a curriculum I haven’t looked at in some time. I also have to navigate a new Ontario Health curriculum that attracts both proponents & detractors - but - a lot more people like me, who are not sure how to feel about it yet. I think I'll write about that next.

Regardless, the 50/20 begins.  I welcome anyone to join me on this leg of the journey.

The Tyranny of Choice


I am finally going to “post” a blog today.  I'm emphasizing the word “post” because I have written, tinkered-with, debated and deleted many over the past five years. This will be the first one I have officially released into the wild.  

This reticence was not due to apprehension about the content but, a self-imposed hesitation about the platform and presentation.  Much like choosing Friday night entertainment on Netflix -  the delay was a product of the "Tyranny of Choice. What do I choose? What should it look like? What will be a great title? Is this good enough?

My routine, for many years, has been the same. I start, or rediscover, an account on a platform (WordPress, Blogger, etc) and then begin to build the perfect blog environment.  I select titles and templates and carefully craft a catchy URL address. I dutifully search YouTube videos to provide me with step-by-step tutorials. Simply put, I exhaust my enthusiasm in the minutia. The "devil is in the details" - but - those demons are sometimes Boredom and Diversion.

Invariably, I would get as far as composing a large, unedited chunk of my first post when distraction would set in...life, circumstance, uncertainty, a hockey game on TV. I would convince myself that I needed time to reflect and I would leave the post unfinished.  

Prior to my return, I would learn of a new platform (Edublogs, SquareSpace) - I have stale accounts on them all - and I would begin the process anew. Today, I have decided that this must end.


Here is what I have learned about getting an education blog started. (And this will be short and simple because of #3)


  1. Just write something that you think is important and that you want to share with fellow educators. Once it is written, you will be far more keen to put it out into the world.
  2. Find a tutorial to help you, but look for a tutorial that is current. Blog platforms change frequently. An excellent tutorial from 2011 may be more confusing than an satisfactory tutorial from last month.
  3. Make your points simple and clear. Write a blog that you can edit easily and can be read in a few minutes.
  4. Have fun. If you are not enjoying the process, blogging is not for you.
  5. Post it. Give it a quick edit and then put it up. You can always revisit it in the future when you gain a new perspective.

With that said - here goes nothing.